P.S. 196, photo credit: malarchie

In addition to releasing letter grades for all city schools, the Department of Education has also released numerical scores1, thus allowing a direct assessment of how each school in District 14 (Greenpoint & Williamsburg, and picking up bits and pieces of Bushwick, Bed Stuy and Clinton Hill) compares to schools citywide and districtwide.

First, an update on the grades we discussed yesterday. In addition to PS 84 and JHS 126, two other District 14 schools earned a “D”, and one earned an “F”. The “F” went to PS 23 (Carter C. Woodson, Willoughby between Tompkins & Marcy2). The other “Ds” went to PS 16 (Leonard Dunkly, Wilson between Bedford and Lee) and PS 59 (William Floyd, Tompkins Houses, Throop and Tompkins3). PS 84, JHS 126 and PS 23 easily fall into the lowest 10% of schools citywide in terms of overall score4; PS 16 and PS 59 just barely break into the second decile.

Among the “A” schools we missed yesterday are:

the High School for Enterprise, Business and Technology (a mini school located within the former Eastern District High School at Bushwick and Grand)
the Urban Assembly School for the Urban Environment5 (also located in Tompkins Houses, between Myrtle & Park)
Conselyea Prep (JHS, Metropolitan and Manhattan)
PS 157 (Benjamin Franklin, Kent, between Park & Myrtle)
PS 147 (Isaac Remsen, Bushwick & McKibbin)
PS 257 (John F. Hylan, Cook between Graham & Humboldt)

Statistically, District 14 schools come out a little bit ahead versus the citywide numbers. 13 schools in the district score below the citywide median, and 16 score above. The fence sitters are PS 110 (the Monitor school), just below the 50% mark, and El Puente Academy, just above6. Five local schools fall within the top 10% of schools citywide (based on overall score): from lowest to highest, PS 132, Urban Assembly repetitive school, Conselyea Prep, Enterprise High and PS 18. All of the A schools fall within the top 20% of schools (based on overall score) citywide. PS 18 (Edward Bush, Maujer & Leonard) falls within the top 2% of schools citywide based on overall score.

Looking beyond just numbers, what is perhaps more interesting what this says (or doesn’t say) about the debate between between “progressive” and “traditional” schools. All of the top tier schools in terms of this rating (those falling in the top 10% citywide) appear to be progressive or magnet schools. But just below that, still in the top 20% citywide, are a host of more traditional schools. These include the two of three primary schools in Greenpoint (PS 34 and PS 31) and JHS 50 on the Southside.

1.Handily laid out in a spreadsheet [warning: download link].↩

2.Which I would call Bed Stuy.↩

3.Also Bed Stuy? That area between Flushing and Myrtle or DeKalb used to have an entirely different name, which escapes me at the moment.↩

4.Even taking these scores with a grain of salt, clearly the “progressive” parents who pilloried for trying to improve PS 84 these past few years had a point.↩

5 Repetitive and redundant, no? Interesting, too, that Topkins Houses is home to one of the worst and one of the best rated schools in the district.↩

6.The effects of grading on a curve: both schools earned a “B”, and yet they fall on either side of the median overall score.↩

…with 40,000 new units of housing expected in Williamsburg and Greenpoint, and 15,000 in Downtown Brooklyn…

I really hope they mean residents, not housing units. Yeah, either way the L train will suck, but there’s an order of magnitude or two of suckiness in there.

(For the record, I remember the waterfront rezoning claiming 10,000 new housing units; Domino is proposing another 2,200. That doesn’t begin to get you close to 40,000 units, and if you (conservatively?) estimate 2.5 people per housing unit, well, you do the math.)

Buried in this NY1 story is some potentially great news: a subsidized water taxi route to Williamsburg. The Water Taxi ™ is one of my preferred routes to Manhattan (after two-wheeling), but it is definitely a) expensive, b) limited in service times, and c) only geographically appropriate to a few. It looks as though the city is trying to tackle (a). But why stop there? They could do something about (c) if they provided free subway and bus transfers.

From Gothamist, a rundown of pending eminent domain actions in the city. I think the list supports my point earlier that there is both good and bad eminent domain. The point is to get rid of the (Supreme Court sanctioned) abuse, while keeping legitimate takings.

Gowanus Lounge has their own take (thankfully sympathetic to my own, and rightfully emphasizing just compensation).

This is pretty brilliant:

Gilliam has started to transform the area from a concrete jungle to a space with a more lived-in look by exploiting a new and little-known Parks Department regulation that permits tree planting on private property if the owner of the land can’t be found.

Craig Murphey was the cyclist who was killed last week while riding at Ten Eyck and Union. Lost in a lot of the speculation and grief over the Craig’s death is the fact that he was “on the job” at the time – volunteering for Right Rides and helping someone get home safely late at night.

Rest in peace.

From Curbed, word that Grand Ferry Park is finally under construction. This reconstruction was originally to have been funded by $350,000 (or so, I’m not great with math) from the NY Power Authority, as partial mitigation for the mini power plant adjacent to the park. A lot of neighborhood activists fought long and hard for that money, and then worked long hours on the park redesign. And then everyone waited. And waited.

And waited some more – until eventually the cost of construction doubled (!). So now the City has kicked in the extra $350K, and work is under way.

We will miss the wood-chip knoll, and the canyon. Especially the canyon.

North Brooklyn is home to a disproportionate number of the City’s waste transfer stations. While the Mayor’s Solid Waste Management Plan would correct this social injustice by distributing transfer stations throughout the five boroughs, many are opposed (including the Mayor’s neighbors on the Upper East Side).

No Impact Man has the lowdown on the latest scheme by Manhattanites to keep their garbage to ourselves – in this case Assembly Members Glick, Gottfried and Rosenthal are trying to keep the legislation off the Assembly floor. Mr. Impact Man has lots of links and lots of good reasons why North Brooklyn residents and everyone else should be calling their Assemblymembers and crying foul. (I would hope that Messrs. Lentol and Lopez are opposed to this, but it is still worth calling about.

[Thanks Kate Z.]

UPDATE: Streetsblog has more.