Broadway Triangle Community Coalition Plan

The Broadway Triangle Community Coalition has taken the PowerPoint for its Pratt plan (which I linked to before) and set it to music.

I still think the plan itself (and the one or two plans BTCC had before that) suffers from a fatal flaw – its just too damn big. I know in the end they backed away from specific numbers, but if you run the numbers implied in their presentations, BTCC is looking to go significantly higher (double or more) than the density of the neighboring public housing projects. They would exceed the density of the waterfront sites in the 2005 zoning by a fair margin. For all the “comprehensive planning” embodied in this plan, there is no practical accounting for how the neighborhood infrastructure will handle this number of people. Nor is there any accounting for how all this new housing – most of it affordable, yes – will impact displacement outside the Triangle.

Tall buildings are fine, but massively oversized buildings that further strain an already overtaxed infrastructure are not.

What a lot of people forget is that this is a land-use review process. For all its flaws on the process side (and it was a very flawed process), the City’s plan – as land-use policy – is basically good (it could be better, and CB1 made recommendations to make it so). In fact, the zoning – what CB1 voted to approve – is at the high end of the density the Board has been willing to support in recent actions. But it is within reason, and it includes a minimum of 34% affordable housing (49% if you believe the City’s numbers, but those rely on developer-incentivized affordable housing, which is iffy, at best).

Meanwhile, I still say the courts (or the city council) are the proper place to address the process (and apportionment) questions.

UPDATE: I almost forgot – there is a hearing at the Borough President’s office on the Broadway Triangle rezoning tomorrow evening. Details here.



✦✦

Mary, RIP

mary2.jpg

mary1.jpg

I came back from a week’s vacation to learn that Mary, who has kept the corner of Bedford and Grand clean for as long as I can remember, died on July 24. She was a beloved fixture on the block, and as the photo to the left shows, will be missed.

A collection is being taken at La Villita bakery to pay for Mary’s burial.




✦✦

Music Sales

NYT infographic on music sales by format, 1973 to 2008. LP sales peaked in 1978, five years before the first CD sales. (8-track sales also peaked in 1978 – clearly a banner year for obsolete formats.)

[Via DF]

Life In the Triangle

It’s not just the “HPD” plan – under anyone’s plans for the Broadway Triangle, Shanghai Stainless Steel (and the other manufacturers) do not have a place. That’s why the industrial relocation money – and proximity requirements – that CB1 insisted on are so critical. Yassky and Lopez have gone on record supporting this money – now they need to deliver.

[UPDATE: Edited title to remove random Viking reference. Sorry about that.]

Citywide Ferry Line Considered

Existing subway lines can be crowded, especially in places such as Brooklyn where subway stops closest to Manhattan (near the water) are often very crowded with commuters.

Sounds familiar.

According to the Eagle, the sites under consideration are Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Sheepshead Bay, Floyd Bennett Field, Coney Island, Bay Ridge, Red Hook and Atlantic Avenue North. Of course if all our condo promises come true, we will have water taxi stops at Domino, Northside Piers, and Greenpoint. Not sure which is more likely to happen – a city-subsidized ferry or a developer-subsidized ferry.

NYT Considers $5 Monthly Web-Acces Fee

Considering that I used to pay $300 to $400 a year to read the Times (picking it up most weekdays and most Sundays), $5 a month would be a bargain. But if they’re going to make it work, they’ll have to think through some very basic web-compatible concepts – like how people link to articles that aren’t free.

Someone needs to come up with the paradigm shifting model that reconciles two (currently) diametrically opposes ideas: 1) information wants to be free; and 2) news is worth paying for.