Building (North) Brooklyn

Tonight, the Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce will present its Building Brooklyn design awards for architectural merit. We here at brooklyn11211 will not be attending, in protest of the fact that not a single North Brooklyn project has been honored this year (as far as we can tell, only one North Brooklyn project was even nominated).
This is very surprising, when you consider the fact that on a per capita basis, North Brooklyn probably has more construction going on than any other part of NYC. Its even more surprising when you consider the fact that so much of that construction is of such high quality. In fact, the Pritzker folks are probably spending most of their time in North Brooklyn these days.
So rather than waste $150 attending an awards show that snubs our fair district, we have decided instead to put together our own list of the great architecture of North Brooklyn, which we will unveil here over the coming days (and we will gladly accept nominations – please email us at 11211[at]brooklyn11211[dot]com). For the most part, these are all projects that have been completed over the past year or so. But since its our award, and we make up the rules, we reserve the right to highlight older projects that clearly stand head and shoulders above their peers.
So without further ado, our first award, in the category of Lost Opportunities, goes to the Toll Brothers development, North 8 Condos.

North8.jpg
Photo: conbon33.

Yes, “Williamsburg is all grown up”, but the buildings are still ugly. And what better place to put an ugly, squat, black-brick building than on North 8th and Kent, where it will forever face out onto public parkland. Think of all the grand design gestures that could have graced this site – a modern-day Central Park West, perhaps? Or maybe this is more of a 21st-century Gramercy Park? NO – on what might be the most prominent upland waterfront site in all of rezoned Williamsburg and Greenpoint, Toll Brothers has opted for Marx-Engels-Platz.1 instead – a building so disappointing that even the developer won’t put a picture of it on their website (or if they do have a picture of it, its pretty well hidden).
So while residents of North 8 Condos revel in their park and river views, the rest of us are forced to wallow in banality. Yes, this dark, brooding presence on the Williamsburg waterfront is there for the long haul, so get used to the asymmetrical fenestration, and the nouveau-factory aesthetic (try this: see if your friends can pick out the luxury condominium from the surrounding factories). Amazingly, this building is more boring than most of the surrounding industrial buildings.
1. OK, that statement is really insulting to East German architecture – the Palace of the Republic had a lot more going for it than this building. I doubt there will be much discussion when this baby comes down.[back]



✦✦

Aloft with a View

Sweeping City Views (click to enlarge)

Its hard to imagine a waterfront hotel with no view, but the much-rumored Aloft hotel at Broadway and Kent just might qualify. To the west, there is nothing but a one-story building and then the East River. But when get right down to it, that might be all you get a view of.
The 200-room hotel (and 98 condo units) would be hard up by the Williamsburg Bridge, which in and of itself would be a view killer. But with 30 and 40 story towers coming to the Domino site just north of the bridge, the midtown views have be pretty fleeting even from the top floors of the hotel. At least there are views of the Financial District, right? Not so fast. What Schaeffer Landing doesn’t block already, the soon-to-be Kedem Winery development might just finish off.
If our highly scientific research is correct, most of what you’d see from this 20-story-or-so hotel/condo is the East River and Corlear’s Hook. That’s the part of Manhattan just south of the Williamsburg Bridge that is loaded with public and union housing projects (some of which are quite nice buildings in their own right).
Not exactly million dollar views, but at least Aloft would be convenient to transportation… its only seven blocks to the JMZ.



✦✦

Goodbye for now

The Quadriad proposal continues to be a cliffhanger. As you may recall, in early June, the land use committee of CB1 voted narrowly (by a one vote margin) to “approve” the concept of the Quadriad plan. After much confusion over what exactly the Quadriad plan was, and therefore what it had approved (and even why it was approving a plan with no application), the full Community Board voted at its June meeting to table the committee’s resolution. Tonight, CB1 voted unanimously (14 to 0, with 5 abstentions) to reject the committee’s recommendation, thus killing any Community Board “approval” of the Quadriad plan.

But not so fast… Earlier in the day, the Community Board received a letter from Quadriad, withdrawing its proposal. The letter, which touted the committee approval, stated that Quadriad did not require further action from the Community Board, and that the developer was prepared to move forward with its as-of-right development and begin the formal process of applying for a rezoning to allow a 20-story tower on the corner of Berry and North 3rd and a tripling of density on the site, all in order to create 33% affordable housing on site without any public funding. (No word on their plans for the rest of the neighborhood, or the city as a whole, but Quadriad has said all along that it plans to file for citywide zoning changes.)

So as it stands now, Quadriad has withdrawn its proposal (but promised to return with a real application), and the Community Board has voted unanimously not to endorse the Quadriad plan (but hasn’t specifically voted against the plan). If we could explain this in a chart, we would.

Rest assured, though, like any good summer blockbuster, there will be a sequel.



✦✦

Street name changes in the Eastern District

Miss Heather has uncovered some nice evidence of old street names in Greenpoint. When you look at it, it seems as though all of the streets in North Brooklyn were renamed subsequent to the annexation of the Eastern District by the City of Brooklyn in 1855.
Greenpoint’s cross streets were A through Q; they were then renamed Ash through Quay. (Although how this Clinton Street got into the mix, I don’t know – I guess Calyer Street was always an outlier.) Other changes included West Street (which had been Washington), and Manhattan Avenue (which had been Union Place).
The same thing happened in Williamsburg, where the north/south streets had been First through Eleventh Streets; they are now Kent Avenue through Hewes Street.
Miss Heather also discovered that this created a hell of a lot of confusion:

This practice resulted in a slew of duplicate street names* which took years to unsnarl. It was a long and very contentious process. One which, amusingly enough, often saw “North Brooklyn” (AKA: “The Eastern District”) in opposition to “South Brooklyn” on a number of occasions.

The merger of the two cities (Williamsburgh and Brooklyn) also required the renumbering of a lot of streets. This too created a lot of confusion, and revealed the true independent sprit of North Brooklynites. I’ve read elsewhere that most residents just ignored the law requiring them to renumber their houses. This went on quite literally for decades.
In the 1920s, Eugene Armbruster assembled a scorecard of obsolete street names, which can be found here (the link to all of the pages is here).

Preserving Affordable Housing

The Sun:

The city has preserved the “affordable” status of about 40,000 units, more than half of its 73,000-apartment goal.

However, the efforts for creation of affordable housing are less advanced, as the city has claimed the completion of only 25,000 of its target 92,000 units.

The issue of preservation vs. creation of new housing is critical. These numbers are pretty much in line with what has been happening in Williamsburg of late. In fact, the citywide new housing numbers are well ahead of those in the Williamsburg rezoning area.

Bloomberg’s Affordable Housing Record

Lets first admit that Bloomberg is playing catch up on this. He came in midway through a real estate boom, having inherited a host of unfriendly policies from a generally unfriendly prior regime, and, to his credit, at least recognized the problem. He’s been playing catch up ever since. Even given all that, the record is not outstanding. Rezonings are turning out to be massive give aways, with little in return for local communities or long-term residents. What’s working on the waterfront is not working inland. And all of this plays into the hands of the more outrageous proposals from all sides.
Jones is right that the Mayor has often refused to expend political capital in Albany in support of housing. Jones cites the failure to win rent protections for Mitchell-Lama tenants – the same could be said of the 421a reforms.

Reform DOB

In a no-brainer, the Daily News supports reform at the Department of Buildings.
While we’re at it, lets stop making deals to legalize all the zoning shenanigans: if its not to code, take it down. That might learn a developer or two.

Changes on the Waterfront

Francis Morrone on the Brooklyn waterfront, the National Trust’s endangered list and the “mercurial” David Yassky:

This summer may offer the last best opportunity to view parts of the waterfront in the midst of its transition from a gritty industrial environment to phalanxes of tall residential towers with riverfront esplanades and the occasional park.

This is Fantastic News

The National Trust for Historic Preservation is the latest (and biggest) organization to sign on in support of preserving Brooklyn’s industrial heritage.